The Manipulation of Language used in Brave New World and Animal Farm Essay

The Manipulation of Language apply in Brave New World and Animal Farm - Essay ExampleIn doing so, at that place is chaos and disturbance which gives the reader an apocalyptic image of the world. For example, in Brave New World the order of magnitude is made to conform to a certain culture and belief system. It is trained into believing that everyone is destined to be in the role that they have been placed into, by influence as the Director of Hatcheries in the clean puts it that is the secret of happiness and virtue - liking what youve got to do. All conditioning aims at that making people like their inescapable social destiny. (Huxley, Ch. 1. 1946). The Director of Hatcheries uses his speech communication to keep all the lower classes content with what they had and to explain to them that that was the scarce way that they could lead a life. Mustapha Mond believes that the future idealistic world will consist of conditioned and elegant human being who will submit to the soc ial conventionality. Hence, he governs a very surreal image of humans who be driven away from books and obliged to chase after science. Mond uses his knowledge of the Bible and language of Shakespeare to stop a totalitarian state. He makes language a paradox for others, so much so that when thaumaturgy quotes the words from The Tempest, brave new world, there is more hostility involved in it than amazement because Mustapha Mond creates the World State to look at things in such a manner. Likewise, the language of the pigs becomes ridiculously elitist, controlling, disconnected and a meandering discourse when they speak. This technique highlights the usurpation of power as one of the dominant themes of the novel. The language controls the reality. The linguistic skills of the pigs overpower the undersized language of the rest of the living creatures. The novel opens with the narrative that quickly ascertains the dominance of language through the speech of old Major who was so hi ghly regarded on the farm that everyone was quite alert to lose an hours sleep in order to hear what he had to say (Orwell, Ch.1. 1954). This sets an classical and paternal language structure which is hammered into the other animals like a mandatory act or law even after his death Our lives are miserable, laborious and short. We are born, we are given plainly so much food as will keep the breath in our bodies, and those of us who are capable of it are forced to work to thelast atom of our strength and the very instant that our returns has come to an end we are slaughtered with hideous cruelty. No animal in England knows the meaning of happiness or leisure after he is a year old. No animal in England is free. The life of an animal is misery and slavery that is the plain truth. But is this simply part of the order of nature? (Orwell, Ch.1. 1954) This is probably the most ironic speech in the novel. What Old Major believes he and his fellow animal kingdom has witnessed round human s, the animals have to undergo under the pigs rule after Old Majors departure. When Orwell says The great resistance of clear language is insincerity (Orwell, PE, 1947, para 13) he means precisely under these circumstances. He emphasizes that authoritarianism ruins the language of a particular region according to history. The pigs are insincere towards their fellow